Movies
I just watched Marjane Satrapi’s adaptation of Persepolis, which was adapted from her own graphic novels, which Christine and I borrowed from our friends, Linda y Dante (in fact, we might still have them…sorry). Anyway, I really enjoyed the “comics” and the film is just…I don’t know how to explain it. So many times, you watch something, and it may be entertaining, but you can forget about it later. This film is a perfect adaptation of the comics (which makes sense, as they have the same author). It is entertaining, funny, compelling. So much going on in this film. I don’t want to be one of those high all-mighty types when speaking about film, but this is one of the few movies that you will watch and think that it is an important film.
Persepolis is a look through the eyes of an Iranian girl, as she grows up in Iran, dealing with government changes, causing constant war and forcing loved ones into captivity and (sometimes) execution. Marjane’s parents eventually ship her out of the country, and we follow her journey out of Iran, back to Iran, and then out again. It’s a great story – unfortunate – but a wonderfully told life up until this point.
The animation is just like looking at the comic brought to life. The film is in French with english subtitles. At the end of the film, I was thinking of the words that the Dalai Lama said when Christine and I went to hear him speak in Madison. He said that he doesn’t hate the Chinese people, but he doesn’t like their government. Looks like the same philosophy can apply here. In America, people have the tendency to look at people from Iraq and Iran as terrorists and all that jazz, and this film (and the comics) is a great view into this philosophy. You don’t have to like their government (hell, a lot of the Iranians didn’t like their government), but it’s no reason to act out against its people. I know I don’t people judging me based on the US Government and George Bush…
With money being tight, I’m not buying films anymore. This a film I’m considering to buy to be a part of my collection.
Rating: 4/4
It is probably unfair to Lost Boys: The Tribe to follow up after Persepolis, but, it’s not really going to change the opinion of this film.
How do you follow up a classic film like The Lost Boys, which has lots of fans all around the place? Especially 20 years later? I read that they were trying to go in a different direction but still remain true to the original to give fans something to enjoy. I’m not really sure what the different direction is, as the basic storyline is very similar to the original film. Different direction might be a little more blood, some nudity, more swearing…and an older Corey Feldman returning as Edgar Frog.
The big talk about this film was reuniting the Coreys, as well as original Frog Brother, Jamison Newlander. Both Corey Haim and Jamison Newlander were pretty much cut from the film – Corey survives in a brief scene during the closing credits, while both Haim and Newlander have bigger parts in the Alternate Endings that also appear on the disc. The Alternate Endings seem to be setting up the rumoured third film.
Not much to really say about the film. If it wasn’t a Lost Boys film, it would’ve been an okay movie. It really isn’t that bad. It isn’t the best, but it’s 90 minutes of entertainment. In the beginning, we were pausing the film when we left the room but stopped doing that as the film played on. Maybe that says something. This movie obviously had a lot lower of a budget and threw in a lot of cheesy humour, which just elevated the fact that the film was a direct-to-DVD, low budget film.
All that being said, the opening scene of the movie was done really well, with a great appearance by Tom Savini – offered up a lot of hope for the film. The film was good enough to make me interested in seeing a third, but it wasn’t so good that I’d be depressed if the series stopped.
Rating: 2.5/4
Books
I just finished reading Ira Levin’s Rosemary’s Baby, which was made into a popular film by Roman Polanski. I have the film on DVD – found it on sale for very cheap, and I know I had watched it once many years ago, but I either wasn’t paying attention or was in and out or something. can’t remember, but I know I never really saw the film in any detail. My thought about the book is that I often wish I could be living in the time when the book was written or maybe get some sort of sense of the common thoughts of the day so that I can read the book more in context with the times. Was this a shocking book in the mid-sixties? Knowing enough about the story, did that make it easier to figure out everything that was going on? Or, were you intended to know and be frustrated with Rosemary? “How can you not see what’s going on?”
In any case, it was an excellent book and a great story. Had me looking forward to my train rides into and from work, when I’d pull out the book to read (have to go to Half Price Books to find a new book to read now or go through the ones at home to see if anything looks interesting). I think you are rooting for Rosemary, which is a good quality to instill in your lead character, and everyone else poses the underlying menace that, maybe if you were actually living the life and not reading about it in print, maybe you’d miss it because you wouldn’t expect the story to unfold as it did. So, maybe Rosemary is forgivable there. Knowing the premise, you can tell the creepy characters from the start and can piece just about everything together, while Rosemary struggles to do so. So, I also wonder. If you were one of the first to read the book, not having a film adaptation to go off of or maybe not really hearing much about the book, is it a shocker to read?
When reading books or watching film, I know it is good when it has me thinking of my own fiction (in a good way) – when I want to incorporate something that I’m reading (the style maybe) into my own work, already thinking of ways to twist it. There were a couple points in this book, where I was thinking it was clever the way it was being written and would love to update the style into some modern tale. We’ll see.
I heard the film is a pretty close adaptation to the book, so, if you like the film, go ahead and check out the book. I’m looking forward to dusting off my DVD and finally seeing the film.